The
All-Volunteer Victim Force/Farce aka the USMIL since 1969 has NOT been
populated by America's best & brightest because such ADULT people knowing
and having intrinsic self-worth wouldn't put up with an immoral and incompetent
BUREAUCRACY. If forced to participate via a draft they'd revolt over BS like
what they did during the Vietnam War--threatening the MILINDCOMP's war RACKET.
Today's MILSHEEPLE are in no position to comment on what's best in war in light
of their embraced victimhood and constant excuse-mongering for the
bureaucracy--they have no idea how actual adults would do to fight & win
wars. No idea whatsoever and need to STFU. Those living in mom's basement
playing War Thunder Video Games never doing anything kinetic militarily
most definitely need to STFU.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/40694/amphibious-mc-130j-transport-is-on-special-operations-commands-wishlist?
QUOTE:
The U.S. military, as a whole, has been exploring concepts of operations in recent years that focus heavily on being able to operate from austere and remote areas with very limited infrastructure in the event that large, established bases are destroyed or are otherwise unavailable.
****
Having
real-world, kinetic military experience as well as on top of current
technological developments, I report that the bloated air base is untenable in
the surveillance-covered, 720 degree battlefield world we live in making it
problematical to even do Air-Mech-Strike (AMS) by break-bulk loading RO-RO into
and out of C-27J, C-130H/J, C-17A, C-5B/M transport planes that will be no
longer in existence having been Destroyed-On-The-Ground (D.O.T.G.) earlier by PDMs and/or commando
attacks. Transport plane AMS 3D maneuver will have to be done from hidden
locations undetected by the enemy--hopefully out of range of their PDMs.
Cut out
the Transport Plane Middle-Man
To eliminate the bureaucratic red tape and exposure time
wastage of break-bulk RO-RO via transport planes, the Next Hercules
should pick-up and drop-off modular KIWI pods and future tracked tanks should
fly themselves via AERO Units to do operational/tactical 3D maneuver hops as
pioneers in the 1930s realized we needed to do starting with Walter Christie
whose AeroTank designs are below.
Videos:
Troops in tanks must get adequate rest--which means bunks so drivers can switch-out rested and alert during 24-hour operations.
We live now in an Age of Despair since the 2021 Hoe Xiden election steal into the White House normies did NOTHING to stop. Amerika is populated by LOSERTARDS paralyzed by their mortal fear of dying aka NIHILISM.
People afraid of dying are also afraid of living--so don't expect them to lift a VG finger to create AeroTanks (or anything else involving risk) for a necessary WAR advantage any time soon. They don't think anything is worth fighting for except their delusional right to self-destructive, hedonistic happyness.
The More Kinetic Baby Boom Generation Had a Chance to have AeroCars...
ModelVISION! what a Piasecki AirJeep would be like today:
The Piasecki AirJeep worked--so well they had to equip them with ejection seats they could fly so high Out-of-Ground Effect (OGE). They would have worked well as combination Air/Ground vehicles in Vietnam--especially with the 106mm Recoilless Rifle:
However, it would require the U.S. ARMY TO CHANGE--to actually TRUST subordinates--to have infantry or armor (cavalry) FLY THEMSELVES instead of "Mother May I?" from a separate fly boy Taxi service bureaucracy = RED TAPE = You ain't gonna fly.
SITTING ON YOUR ASS ISN'T GOING TO "FLY" (pun intended) on 720 degree, Non-Linear Battlefields (720 NLB) where tracked, armored tanks must rapidly reposition and not leave signs on the ground visible to enemy C4ISR and PDM or TFS destruction.
Perhaps someone more innovative than the U.S. ARMY will do flying tanks 1st...
Someone like the ENEMY...
Someone like the clever Russians or CCP....
Semper Airborne!
James Bond is REAL.
https://www.militaryissue.com/US-Airborne-Tanks-19391945/productinfo/111998/
ReplyDeleteCharles C. Roberts, Jr. Tanks are heavy, cumbersome vehicles, and before there could be any thought of carrying them by air, much lighter models had to be produced. This title opens with an investigation into the efforts in the 1930s by Britain, the Soviet Union, and the USA into the development of light tanks for airborne operations. It was the start of the Second World War which accelerated efforts to produce an airborne tank and the means of delivery. 208 pages, 100 B&W photos, 6"x 9¼", hardcover.