BATTLETALK 04: UPDATE: Russian Sovietization Offensive Airborne Warfare


Soviet Union Dictator Stalin (Career Kriminal like George Floyd) was Ready to Invade Nazi Germany 1st by Airborne Assault!

http://www.strobertbellarmine.net/books/Suvorov--Icebreaker.pdf

Icebreaker is tedious reading but I got the defector military paratroop/armor officer (Vladimir Rezin) author's secret: Sunday, July 6th Sovietization was to unleash...destroy the Ploesti oil fields and the 3rd Reich would be finished; instead Hitler struck 1st June 22...so my question is....





Did Stalin deliberately let Germany invade to look like the bad guys, get his sheeple behind him and get American war goodies? Brutal Machiavelli--not bad luck as the author concludes...

In 1939, Russia had 139M people--20M mass murdered in kriminal Stalin's purges of moral, stoical people opposed to his nihilist, immoral stoical rule.

https://www.ibtimes.com/how-many-people-did-joseph-stalin-kill-1111789

An amoral psychopath and paranoid with a gangster’s mentality, Stalin eliminated anyone and everyone who was a threat to his power – including (and especially) former allies. He had absolutely no regard for the sanctity of human life.

But how many people is he responsible for killing?

In February 1989, two years before the fall of the Soviet Union, a research paper by Georgian historian Roy Aleksandrovich Medvedev published in the weekly tabloid Argumenti i Fakti estimated that the death toll directly attributable to Stalin’s rule amounted to some 20 million lives (on top of the estimated 20 million Soviet troops and civilians who perished in the Second World War), for a total tally of 40 million.

Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev, a Soviet politician and historian, estimated 35 million deaths.

Most other estimates from reputed scholars and historians tend to range from between 20 and 60 million.

****

If we take the low mass extermination number of 20M and add it to the 168M Russian population of 1939 before WW2, we can apply the 25/40/35 Ponerologist formulas to ascertain WHAT TYPE OF PEOPLE STALIN MURDERED...

https://www.calculator.net/percent-calculator.html

188M Pre-Purge Russians.

25% Psych-Sociopaths: 47M

40% Authority-Following Sheeple: 75.2M

35% Conscience-doers:  65.8M

Surprise! Surprise!

The 20-60M mass murder number coincides with the number of moral, stoical Conscience-doers in any society. 

With moral people out-of-the-way, Stalin was left with only psych-sociopaths like himself and a 40% sheeple who blindly follow authority--but would they have kept on murdering & pillaging after destroying Nazi Germany to Sovietize all of Europe since oppressed workers DID NOT rise up against the corporations they slaved for at the end of WW1? 

Fast forward to 1945, the Red Army has Berlin.

Would they have continued westward if Stalin ordered them to?

Was the West as weakened fighting the "Icebreaker" immoral, stoical fascist Nazis as Stalin wanted them?

No.

The U.S. ARMY and the U.K. armies stood on the outskirts of Berlin armed, equipped and more war-hardened than ever before under the great, non-bureaucratic leadership of moral stoical innovators, Generals Patton, Ridgway, Gavin...

www.combatreform.org/paratrooper.htm

Nazi Germany had attacked Russia 1st. 

Now it was destroyed. 

What grudge would the Russian peasant 40% sheeple have against Belgium, Holland, France?

Did they need a grudge when they took Poland as ordered by dictator Stalin?

One must conclude had not the Western powers blocked the Soviets from taking the rest of Europe in 1945, Stalin would have expanded westward and taken it all "freeing them" from industrial slave oppression.

RAMIFICATIONS...

2x weeks delay Hitler invading Russia and we'd all either not exist because our fathers would have died fighting in a continued WW2 or we'd be all speaking Russian and practicing godless, nihilistic Communism--stoical WOKETARDISM before there were the lazy, refuse-to-work, hedonistic Amerikan version.. 

Why 3D Maneuver Airborne Warfare?

007 Indiana Jones ADVENTURE: "Fast Getaway"

https://jamesbondisreal.blogspot.com/2021/05/007-indiana-jones-fast-getway.html

The Icebreaker author dedicates a whole chapter explaining why the Soviet Union had and still has the world's largest and best qualitatively-equipped Airborne Forces in the world: to cross Russia's vast distances quickly and get BEHIND enemy forces and collapse them from within. The best Hollywood depiction of a tracked tank armored attack on enemy infrastructure is the 3x M4 Sherman medium tanks destroying a German railroad junction in "Kelly's Heroes":

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4DMOT3aBAHhW/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lELZMc7mvgw

The Soviet weakness was expecting to remove Christie BT-7 light tank's tracks and fighting them as armoured cars along Germany's paved highways & roads...



If Germany struck 1st, in a defensive war on rural Russian soil, instead of an offensive war on paved Germany, the BT-7's narrow tracks were not good enough cross-country mobility.

Transport Aircraft to Airland or Airdrop Tanks

Russia did not have an aircraft in WW2 to CARRY light to medium tanks like it can now with jet IL-76 and AN-124s...but they could TOW gliders using their excellent Pe-8 (TB-7) bombers had they been able to go on the offensive early and gain air supremacy by destroying the German Luftwaffe via D.O.T.G.

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tb-7-b-17.htm

Although the TB-7 was about the same size as the B-17, the Soviet aircraft had a much larger wing area, and a maximum takeoff weight nearly twice that of the American bomber. The maximum speed and practical ceiling of the Soviet bomber were markedly less than that of the American plane, at a time when speed and altitude were at a premium to overcome emerging defenses. The TB-7 maximum range with a 4,400 lbs bomb load was 2,900 miles at a speed of 174 mph. The B-17 could only equal or better this range by using bomb bay fuel tanks which reduced its bomb load to 2,000 lb.

The Pe-8 had both 12.7s and 20mm cannons facing largely to the rear and downwards. It had no real defense from attacks from the side, front, or top. Although the Pe-8 employed heavier weapons, the Pe-8 was less well defended than the B-17, particularly as the American's power turrets

https://1sttac.blogspot.com/2021/05/tactismart-62-arm-yourself-transport.html

...were far superior in operation to those on the Russian aircraft. There's no question that was more effective at shooting down planes trailing or even passing behind it than the B-17. The Pe-8, like the other non-U.S. bombers, operated chiefly at night with a view to improving its chances of survival in hostile airspace.

****

It's conceivable that a glider could have been created large enough to carry 17-ton BT-7 light tanks or better yet lighter, more-efficient, turret-less STUGSKIs.

https://jamesbondisreal.blogspot.com/2021/04/spythink-056-russias-flying-tanks.html

https://weaponsandwarfare.com/gliders-of-the-soviet-union/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RfqbHkt-0Y


The MP-1 powered glider is fascinating because after being towed aloft with its engines helping, upon landing and emptied, it could take-off empty and fly back to base for re-use instead of being snatched like the USAAF did using C-47s and WACO gliders.

https://weaponsandwarfare.com/gliders-of-the-soviet-union/

The MP-1 had to be assisted at take-off when carrying a full load, but when empty could take off without assistance. It was released by its tow-plane once airborne and flew at 100 miles per hour, having a range of close to 500 miles.

****

Fighter-Gliders

Understanding that once airborne, an aircraft needs less thrust to fly than at Take-Off (TO)..what's even more fascinating is the proposed U.K. Hamilcar heavy glider carrying a light tank with a P-38 Lightning fighter-bomber on top to do the same as above or...detach in the battle area and defend against enemy fighters and/or ground attack the Assault Landing Zones (ALZs) to clear them of enemies for the gliders to safely airland.

U.S. Glider History--and FUTURE

https://www.combatreform.org/gliders.htm

Tanks that FLY THEMSELVES

Christie's Flying Tanks

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jkvil8KNcfcb/

A-10 Warthog BATTLEBOXtanks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58ADcUthPdo

Infantry AEROSWARMS

For massed infantry, they could FLY THEMSELVES as well as be parachute-dropped from transport planes using inflatable planes.

http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/the-inflatable-plane/

Just a few laters, the Soviets began work on an inflatable aircraft for their infantry forces that could be carried by two men in a large bag, unpacked and rolled out, inflated and flown with the aid of a small reciprocating engine.  Created by P. Gorokhovsky, who worked in the Experimental Institute of the Commissariat for Heavy Industry, the idea was to fly the inflatable plane behind enemy lines, carrying Soldiers into the enemy’s rear.  The plane would then be deflated and trucked back after victory.  This was in 1935 and at the time, the Soviets held most of the world’s gliding records, demonstrating an extraordinarily advanced glider design industry — their design was thus an inflatable glider with supplemental power.

Strangely, the Soviets were hellbent on militarizing gliders above all, and an inflatable glider filled the box for an infantry weapon that would dramatically enhance mobility.  Their inflatable plane, as such, was more like a glider with supplemental power — it worked and the Soviets were able to fly a number of tests to prove the concept.

****

Change infantry PARTISAN mission to a SPY Mission.

What benefit would inflating the inflatoplane with LTA HELIUM offer?

https://www.livescience.com/64186-plane-blimp-plimp-aircraft.html

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-48013519

The PLIMP & PHOENIX described above are amazing--but is still too fat & slow more LTA than HTA. 

Helium has 0.0114 pounds per cubic foot. For a one cubic foot helium filled balloon , gravity pulls the down on the helium with a force of 0.0114 pounds while the air pushes up with a force equal to the weight of the air the helium displaced, or 0.0807 pounds. The difference in the up and down force is 0.069 pounds.

https://www.omnicalculator.com/everyday-life/helium-balloons

A 200-pound man needs 3, 000 cubic feet of helium to lift him 10 feet into the air

This is more like it--a HelumPlane:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24571-helium-filled-airplane-could-help-in-disaster-zones/

https://www.combatreform.org/inflatoplanes.htm

The essential problem in flight by air pressure differential is that you need lots of wing or ... The Goodyear Inflatoplane was an experimental aircraft made by the Goodyear ... 28 feet length x 6 feet wide x 1 feet high = 168 cubic feet of helium.

DIMENSIONS (Model GA-468).- Span 22 ft. (6.7 m.) Length 19 ft. 8 in. (8.0 m.)

WEIGHTS (Model GA-468).-Weight empty 225 Ib. (102 kg.) Weight loaded 550 Ib. (250 kg.)

PERFORMANCE (Model GA-468).- Max. speed 72 m.p.h. (115 km.h.) Cruising speed 60 m.p.h. (96 km.h.) Stalling speed 37 m.p.h. (59 km.h.) Rate of climb at S/L 550 ft./min. (170 m./min.) Service ceiling 10,300 ft. (3,140 m.) Take-off run (grass) 250 ft. (76 m.) Landing run (grass) 350 ft. (107 m.) Endurance 6.5 hours

GA-468

Wings

22 feet length x 6 feet wide x 1 feet high = 132 cubic feet of helium

Fuselage

20 feet length x 3 feet wide x 2 feet high = 120 cubic feet of helium

______________________________________________________

252 cubic feet of helium =

One cubic foot of helium will lift about 28.2 grams = 7, 106.4 grams =

14.56 pounds of buoyant lift

Empty weight 225.00 pounds

Helium lift 14.56 pounds

_________________________

210.44 pounds

Russian KILLER BEES

The inflatoplane infantry AEROSWARMS could have been escorted by Russian KILLER BEES--SAM-23s with 20mm autocannon, 7.62mm medium machine guns & rockets!

https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.php?aircraft_id=2058

Alexsandr A. Moskalev never found the level of success that his Soviet World War 2-era (1939-1945) peers found - most of his forward-thinking designs ended their days as mere "paper airplanes". Plenty of contributions were apparent, however, and these ranged from the SAM-1 sesquiplane monoplane fighter of 1930 to the SAM-28 motorized glider of 1943. In-between there lay a plethora of design forms that included the "SAM-23", a single-seat, single-engine ground-attack aircraft of unique design form appearing during the fighting of World War 2 in 1943.

NOTE: The "SAM-23" designation was also used for a later troop-carrying glider of 1944. While incorporating a twin-boom layout, it held a boxy fuselage and was its own design apart from the SAM-23 ground-attack platform detailed in this article.

The aircraft was given a centralized nacelle making up the fuselage and housing the avionics, cockpit, and propulsion system while the tail section was made up of a twin-boom configuration. The single-seat cockpit was positioned just aft of the rounded nose section and covered over in a framed canopy. Views to the rear were obstructed by the raised dorsal spine as well as the wing mainplanes, which were shoulder-mounted atop the fuselage. The engine was seated aft and above the pilot's position in "pusher" configuration and set to drive a simple two-bladed propeller unit - pushing air between the two tail booms. The booms were joined at the aft-end of the aircraft by a single horizontal plane which, rather interestingly, mounted only a single vertical tail fin (two outboard planes were typical of such designs). The undercarriage was fixed and of a tail-dragger arrangement, incorporating two large main wheels forward and a small single wheel aft.

Drive power was to come from 1 x Mikulin M-11 series engine offering 150 horsepower.

One of the more interesting aspects the aircraft was a retracting tail wheel skid that is explained as a rudimentary terrain-following device, lowered and raised as needed.



The aircraft was proposed with armament comprised of 2 x 20mm ShVAK autocannons as well as 2 x 7.62mm ShKAS machine guns to go along with support for up to 4 x RS-82 air-to-surface rockets. This would have given it considerable killing power for the period, certainly suitable for ground-attack sorties against German convoys and static postions.

****

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-82_(rocket_family)

Following the pioneering use of Le Prieur rockets in the use of air-launched rocket armament in World War I, done since 1916 on the Western Front, and that had been first done for the Central Powers in WW I by Rudolf Nebel from Halberstadt D.II biplanes of the Luftstreitkräfte during the first half of 1916, the earliest known use by the Soviet Air Force of aircraft-launched unguided anti-aircraft rockets in combat against heavier-than-air aircraft took place in August 1939, during the Battle of Khalkhin Gol. A group of Polikarpov I-16 fighters under command of Captain N. Zvonarev were using RS-82 rockets against Japanese aircraft, shooting down 16 fighters and 3 bombers in total.[1] Six Tupolev SB bombers also used RS-132 for ground attack during the Winter War. RS-82 officially entered service in 1937 and RS-132 in 1938.

****

Beautiful ModelVISION! Diorama by Bjorn Jacobsen

Other KILLER BEES include the 2.36"/60mm Bazooka-armed L4 Piper Cub STOL Grasshoppers of the U.S. ARMY as well as 66mm rocket-armed, SAAB MFI-9/17 Supporters used by von Rosen in the Biafra war to D.O.T.G. the Nigerian AF...

www.combatreform.org/killerbees.htm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjOv2ntmvT0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRaIXaiwQbs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR51NY8NDE4

Today's AHLRC BATTLEBOXbronco2 looks very much like the SAM-23! GMTA!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2ixSjZj9UU

A folding-wing PC-6 Turbo Porter KILLER BEE like the Royal Thai's AU-23 Peacemaker for the U.S. ARMY would be fantastic...

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MAg8B9Ug4MVw/

****

Semper

https://www.combatreform.org/2LTMichaelSparksUSMCR.htm

Airborne!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkRaE3UEags

Commander Ian Fleming RNVR 1939-51 wrote the James Bond 007 books/movies for the Information Research Division (IRD) of MI6-SIS who he worked for as a Master Spy under journalistic cover from 1933-39 and 1945-1964 when he was murdered (as concluded by legendary investigative reporter, Jim Marrs to me) to prevent him publicly condemning the Warren Commission white wash of the CIA's group ambush murder of his friend, President John F. Kennedy.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hlwjiDU6qoF1/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jHwnQ76xxh4P/

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Sj9CnXlfNz62/

https://www.exopermaculture.com/2012/05/27/new-book-claims-that-ian-fleming-was-james-bond-his-fiction-was-real-and-drawn-from-his-own-life/

http://www.jamesbondisforreal.com

James Bond is REAL.

Comments

  1. https://www.militaryissue.com/US-Airborne-Tanks-19391945/productinfo/111998/

    Charles C. Roberts, Jr. Tanks are heavy, cumbersome vehicles, and before there could be any thought of carrying them by air, much lighter models had to be produced. This title opens with an investigation into the efforts in the 1930s by Britain, the Soviet Union, and the USA into the development of light tanks for airborne operations. It was the start of the Second World War which accelerated efforts to produce an airborne tank and the means of delivery. 208 pages, 100 B&W photos, 6"x 9¼", hardcover.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment