Future WARTHINK 045: STOP Military Vehicle Fires BEFORE They Occur--No Excuses for the Status Quo, MilReformer Envy-Haters
PENTAGON WARS:
"IMAGINATION is MORE IMPORTANT than Knowledge" Saith Einstein
“The poorest way to face life is to face it with a sneer”
--President Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt
https://1sttac.blogspot.com/2022/01/future-warthink-045-stop-military.html
Here we
see an example of an envious, butthurt critic/scorner of men actually IN THE
ARENA of military reforms--LTC Burton, myself and BlacktailFA in the
20-something video gamer's typical mock-it-to-ignore-it style favored by
do-nothings to try to divert the loserhood heat of their listless, so
far-to-date, failed lives.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Nirvana
fallacy (perfect-solution fallacy) – solutions to problems are rejected because
they are not perfect.
****
WHAT THE VIDEO SHOULD BE ABOUT IS HOW THE BRADLEY'S
175 GALLONS OF DANGEROUS FUEL SHOULD BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED TO THE LEFT/RIGHT
OUTSIDE REAR LIKE M113A3 GAVINS HAVE.
www.combatreform.org/tafvfirefighting.htm
This way
we don't have Soldiers burning-to-death and "earning" Medals
of Honor at the cost of being horribly disfigured for life that immoral stoics
somehow think is uber kool.
WE DO NOT GIVE A FUCK HOW GETS CREDIT FOR THIS NEEDED
REFORM--JUST DO IT to paraphrase steal a WOKETARD mantra.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie
A lie is
an assertion that is believed to be false, typically used with the purpose of deceiving
someone
Bullshit (also
B.S., bullcrap, bull) does not necessarily have to be a complete fabrication.
While a lie is related by a speaker who believes what is said is false,
bullshit is offered by a speaker who does not care whether what is said is
true because the speaker is more concerned with giving the hearer some
impression. Thus bullshit may be either true or false, but demonstrates a lack
of concern for the truth that is likely to lead to falsehoods.[12]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=2gOGHdZDmEk
geodkyt
7 days
ago
JUSTICE
compels me to publicly REBUKE this low-ranking enlisted, irresponsible USMIL
fangirl, BS liar libeler, geodyk. I
label him the above BASED ON HIS EXACT WORDS. Go read them with
some TUMS nearby.
His BS is
in " ".
"Sparks
is a particularly amusing example of Dunning-Kruger. (Note, I did engage him seriously about 20
years ago, thinking he was serious and well-intentioned. I'm an actual military design engineer who
is- and at the time was - involved in combat systems design.)"
FACT: WHO
is this liar libeler? I don't recall talking to anyone resembling him then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Ad
hominem – attacking the arguer instead of the argument.
Appeal to
spite – generating bitterness or hostility in the listener toward an
opponent in an argument.[82]
Poisoning
the well – a subtype of ad hominem presenting adverse information
about a target person with the intention of discrediting everything
that the target person says.[73]
Appeal to
motive – dismissing an idea by questioning the motives of its proposer.
Appeal to
the stone (argumentum ad lapidem) – dismissing a claim as absurd without
demonstrating proof for its absurdity.[62]
Proof by
assertion – a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction;
sometimes confused with argument from repetition (argumentum ad infinitum,
argumentum ad nauseam)
Argument
from repetition (argumentum ad nauseam or argumentum ad infinitum) – repeating
an argument until nobody cares to discuss it any more and referencing that
lack of objection as evidence of support for the truth of the conclusion;[65][66]
sometimes confused with proof by assertion
****
His BS
false assertions aka lies about me are not backed by facts--he should be
smacked-in-the-face saying falsehoods about my intentions--this is yet another
example of the nihilist WOKETARDED age we live in where people have no worries
about making up public lies about others. That the Amerikan INjustice system
not have just libel laws are a major cause--one should not have to suffer
financial $$$ damages to deserve and attain justice aka have lies retracted.
Methinks the practice of pistol dueling dealt with losertards like geodyk.
"His
views on how airborne operations demonstrate his complete lack of understanding
them"
Specific
examples?
This is
vagueness another logical fallacy technique.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
False attribution
– appealing to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated
source in support of an argument.
****
"basing
everything he knows on going through the parachute course (to my knowledge, he
only did the 5 jumps to get his wings"
STRAW MAN
LOGICAL FALLACY. LYING.
STFU and
find out before shooting your mouth in public about someone else's views.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Straw man
fallacy – misrepresenting an opponent's argument by broadening or
narrowing the scope of a premise and/or refuting a weaker version of their
argument
****
Just
looking at my Operation DARK CLAW bike jump would mean U.S. Army jump school 5
+ 1.
However,
this junior enlisted butthurt is devoid of original ideas of his own and just
wants to envy smash someone who performs better than he does diminishing him in
his ZERO SUM sickthink. A courtier for the korrupt yes-man, USMIL bureaucracy.
https://www.google.com/search?q=courtier
What is
the example of courtier?
A person
who uses flattery to get something or to win favor. The definition of a
courtier is a person who is an attendant in the court of a king, queen or
royalty, or someone who flatters or kisses up to gain favor. A person in
the royal court that tends to the needs of the king is an example of a
courtier.
****
"I'm
a jumpmaster with over 150 static line jumps with three generations of US
military parachutes and a cigar box full of foreign military jump wings
awarded)."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Appeal to
accomplishment – an assertion is deemed true or false based on the
accomplishments of the proposer. This may often also have elements of appeal to
emotion (see below).
Courtier's reply –
a criticism is dismissed by claiming that the critic lacks sufficient
knowledge, credentials, or training to credibly comment on the subject matter.
Tu quoque
('you too' – appeal to hypocrisy, whataboutism) – stating that a position is
false, wrong, or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act
consistently in accordance with it.[109]
****
Butthurt
reveal above.
Jumping a
million times with no inspirational creativity isn't going to surpass those
with imagination.
"He
doesn't understand that jumps made under training safety rules for the basic
qualification course are NOT how combat jumps are conducted. And there is a reason the US Army doesn't use
the WWII parachute deployment system (I've read the safety stat reports on the
various developments - we stopped doing it that way before my dad went through
jump school during Korea, because we were unnecessarily killing people)."
WHERE THE
FUCK DOES THIS COME FROM?.
Straw man
from someone who is either ignorant or lying.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
False
attribution – appealing to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or
fabricated source in support of an argument.
****
I have
NEVER said to use WW2-style instant canopy opening 1st systems. He has not gone
to my web pages and read with COMPREHENSION. I suspect his I.Q. is low and he's
not bright.
"Also,
there are good military reasons why military static line rigs for mass exits
aren't set up like civilian skydiver free fall rigs and why we don't want the
82nd Airborne using the same canopies for a battalion or brigade assault on an
airfield as a 12 man SF ODA would use for a covert insertion into broken
country."
WHERE THE
FUCK DOES THIS COME FROM?.
Straw man
from someone who is either ignorant or lying.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
False
attribution – appealing to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or
fabricated source in support of an argument.
****
I have
NEVER said to use steerable canopies for mass tactical jumps. He has not gone
to my web pages and read with COMPREHENSION. I suspect his I.Q. is low and he's
not bright.
THE ABOVE
LOGICAL FALLACY IS CALLED STRAW-MANNING.
I
advocate Russian-style static-line-deployed drogue chutes for mass tactical
jumps so we don't need 2x non-jumping safeties to pull in static lines and air
sucking deployment bags.
www.combatreform.org/highaltitudemasstac.htm
"His
ideas of ship design for surface combatants and aviation ships (my specific
professional focus as an engineer) are, simply put, entirely laughable and
consisting of extrapolating from designs that were thoroughly examined in
detail and rejected for damned good reasons back in the 1950s, '60s, and
'70s."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Pooh-pooh
– stating that an opponent's argument is unworthy of consideration.[83]
****
Another
reveal: status quo bureaucracy apologist aka courtier desperately wants
to deny my originality when my DECENCY and RESPECT cites similar ideas by
others as PRECEDENTS.
Again,
straw man lying without consulting me to FIND OUT WHERE I GOT THE IDEAS?
I usually
COME UP WITH THE IDEA ORIGINALLY, THEN look for past precedents.
"His
ideas on military small arms ignore all technical advances since the end of
Vietnam, and ignore over 100 years of combat history, to focus on the Black
Swan events to the exclusion of 99% of combat usage. (And yes, before becoming an engineer for the
Navy, I was an Army Infantry NCO.)"
Examples?
Vagueness--appeal
to vaguesness logical fallacy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slothful_induction
"The
opposite, slothful induction, is the fallacy of denying the logical
conclusion of an inductive argument, dismissing an effect as 'just a
coincidence' when it is very likely not
An
example of slothful induction might be that of a careless man who has had
twelve accidents in the last six months and it is strongly evident that it was
due to his negligence or rashness, yet keeps insisting that it is just a
coincidence and not his fault.[1] Its logical form is: evidence suggests X
results in Y, yet the person in question insists Y was caused by something else.[2]".
Appeal to
novelty (argumentum novitatis, argumentum ad antiquitatis) – a proposal
is claimed to be superior or better solely because it is new or modern.[86]
****
Example:
The MACRO-LEVEL FACT that the PPSh41's (65x practical) 71-round drum firing a
defacto assault mini-rifle cartridge had destructive effects on our Korean War
Soldiers with 8- and 15-shot M1 Garands and M1 carbines are not "Black
Swan" events.
https://1sttac.blogspot.com/2021/12/tactismart-088-case-for-assault-pistol.html
Typical
bureaucracy excuser enlistedman claiming shit is steak, pass me the steak sauce
etc.
"I
presume his ideas in areas where I do not have intimate and expert knowledge are
similarly silly, in general."
Sounds
like the definition of PREjudice from an envy hater aka argument from spite
does it not?
Make up
lies about someone and repeat the lies for _________________ fill-in-the-blank
this or that. The classic nihilist scorner technique.
"He
does have some good ideas about field equipment for dismounted troops."
Does this
not contradict the above?
Make your
minds up, scorner.
"Most
of which the US Army was already looking at before he said a word about
them"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Pooh-pooh
– stating that an opponent's argument is unworthy of consideration.[83]
****
Prove
this with specific examples and dates.
I have
been creating new military ideas since 1981.
JUDGING
from geodyk's bad faith lying and/or ignorance of what I have publicly
published, it's highly probable he is in no fucking position or has any facts
about who came up with what idea 1st AS IF THIS MATTERS?
THIS SEEMS TO BE HIS MAIN BUTTHURT.
Geodyk is obsessed with WHO IS GOING TO GET THE CREDIT
FOR MILITARY REFORMS.
I DO NOT.
I want the USMIL unfucked up.
It's
fucked up because of status quo excuse-mongering assholes like Geodyk who make
high I.Q. intelligent people not want to defend our country. It's not a stretch
or libel to see he is PROJECTING and it is really HE who is not sincere and
well-intentioned; in the service as a personal ego trip, now playing enlisted
scorner bureaucracy cheerleader.
"and
many of the others have been overcome by better ideas that are now
standard."
LIKE
WHAT?
Vague
again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Thought-terminating
cliché – a commonly used phrase, sometimes passing as folk wisdom, used to quell
cognitive dissonance, [EDITOR: like the supposedly "great"
USMIL is actually fucked up: defeats in Vietnam/Afghanistan etc.] conceal
lack of forethought, move on to other topics, etc. – but in any case, to end
the debate with a cliché rather than a point.
****
It seems
he is acting like an immature child desperate to deny 1LT Sparks has
out-performed him in good faith as it belittles him in likely ZERO SUM.
One of
the surprises I experienced was getting my 1st Army Achievement Medal in an
unit formation. I had worked for months behind the scenes to make the unit
better on my own time for no pay.
AFTERWARDS...
I got
looks of hate not congrats.
IT WAS A
FUCKING AAM!
Everyone
deserves and gets one or more.
Why rain
on my parade for my 1st post-USMC award?
Sheesh.
The All
Volunteer Victim Force Farce is indeed a sick place of selfish people
reflecting badly on Amerikan society at large and makes it no surprise we lose
Vietnams/Afghanistans--or any long-term conflict requiring FUNCTIONAL HUMILITY.
Summary
Geodyk
should publicly correct/retract his libel lies made against me or stop even
pretending to be a DECENT and FACTUAL ADULT. He could simply immorally dig
in--as is usually the case--with BAD FAITH scorners; symptomatic of moral
kollapse Amerika.
Geodyk
can state his actual name in public instead of being a pussy hiding behind some
screen name, man-up and contact me so I can chew his disrespectful, lying ass
out.
Conclusion
Where are
Geodyk's military reforms?
Has none
because he is in love with the USMIL staus quo he feeds off for selfish
vanity?
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/63389/roosevelts-man-arena
Roosevelt
railed against cynics who looked down at men who were trying to make the
world a better place. “The poorest way to face life is to face it with a
sneer,” he said. “A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to
criticize work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an
intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life's realities—all
these are marks, not ... of superiority but of weakness.”
Then he
delivered an inspirational and impassioned message that drew huge applause:
"It
is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man
stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit
belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust
and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and
again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does
actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great
devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the
end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at
least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with
those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
John 3:16
Semper
Airborne!
James
Bond is REAL.
Mike Sparks
Comments
Post a Comment