Future WARTHINK 042: The Lies of DoD (The Pentagon)
The Future Battlefield and Civilian Life Demands Lies Be
Discarded and Truths Acted On, PART 1: No More Bad Aerodynamic Kinetic Jeopardy
"It's easier
to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
--Mark Twain
Universal Human Intransigence
Garden of Eden, fallen human beings would rather remain
deceived than admit THEY are fucked-up aka wrong about anything.
No Amerikans today use the term "common sense"
anymore since their countrymen and women have been computer-deceived to believe
a myriad of fancy lies by the Illuminati secret societies they insist on "don't
exist" as the latter murders them and leaves their "all-seeing
eye" 666/www symbolism calling cards in plain sight. The latest
Illuminati deathvax will mass murder millions in the next 3x to 5x years by
blood clots, organ failures, weakened immunity if all goes according to their
Satan-inspired plans derived by directly talking to evil supernatural
demons--their claim to rule over us because they are supposedly "illuminated"
talking to avowed enemies of mankind.
https://jamesbondisreal.blogspot.com/2021/12/spythink-090-illuminati-talk-to.html
Running a close 2nd place to the demon-talking Illuminati
in unjustified arrogance are human pilots--"aviators" who
think their Pilot, Engine, Airframes (PEA) failures don't stink--even enough to
demand a PLAN B of escape parachutes:
www.combatreform.org/escape.htm
However, jet fighters crash so often ejection seats are
aviator-tolerated--everyone else can crash & burn!
Aviators milking aviation inefficiencies to subsidize
pampered airports with runways separates them from the non-flying, population
at large whose tax and vacation and mail-order dollars funds them. Do you even
know a pilot? They are off in their fantasy and sometimes tangible aerial world
apart from the common people. The Illuminati insures the wonders of aviation
are kept from sheeple by not teaching it in high schools which is patently
absurd as America is supposed to the land of EAGLES. Sheeple nihilist cynicism
was so rampant in my high school co-located to a huge MILINDCOMPLEX, they
mocked our "Jets" mascot since they were allowed no "skin
in the game" of flying. I owe a huge debt of gratitude to my
bosomy-sexy 6th grade teacher rewarding me with a flight in a Cessna 150 with a
nearby Air Traffic Controller and my CAP USAFR liaison LTC mentor for inspiring
me not to succumb to destructive hedonism. My years of military reform efforts
are my small pay-back for their and others faith in me.
In general, sheeple refuse to admit to any wrongs in
detail and correct them as if their entire civilizational house-of-cards will
collapse--instead of being sturdy, wise adults not disenchanted by
to-be-expected TBATE Murphy's Law and Cainite TBAM problems arising requiring
Arks (technological solutions) be built. This is why to restore America from
the current Amerika, we need 2x years of National Service (NS) to re-connect
our population to kinetic, objective realities of REAL life.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ia17AnJ8mqkl/
Sheeple go to the point of madness by deliberating
milking and keeping solvable problems in play because it involves more Humtpy
Dumpty triers than simply getting him back together aka RACKETEERING.
www.combatreform.org/RACKETTHEORYv6.0.htm
LIE #1: Wheels can somehow go where only Tracks can
www.combatreform.org/WHEELSVSTRACKS
In the western military mind, deceitful mentalism has
corroded everything by dictatorial bureaucracy demanding lies be accepted by
blind obedience--or else-the naked emperor on air-filled rubber tires
deceitfully presented as cross-country mobile when only tracked vehicles are. Personal,
direct EXPERIENCE with wheels/tracvks aka OBJECTIVE PHYSICAL REALITY means
nothing to them if the boss says Strykers/Humvees/JLTVs/MAVs are mobile
enough as they send milsheeple to their incineration deaths in these wheeled
flaming coffins along roads/trails they must use. MILSPEEPLE refuse to admit
wheeled trucks are failures and sugar-coat deaths/maimings by talk, talk, talk
of the milvictim's heroism. What about the virtues of WINNING by OVERCOMING and
SOLVING PROBLEMS and coming home a LIVING hero instead? Ulysesses--not
Achilles.
We can half-track the over 250k U.S. ARMY trucks we have:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZaBZtgSMJQTM/
How about FLYING OVER ambushes?
Luddite, status quo establishment losers
emotionally envy-attack the M113A8 AeroGavin flying tank because they
immaturely don't want the tracked armored amphibous, cross-country box--now
able to fly over obstacles, bad terrain, land mines, enemies etc.--getting the
credit and esteem it deserves when IT's A FUCKING INANIMATE
OBJECT--not a person! How does an inanimate object receiving adulation diminish
them in zero sum gamestupid? Admiration should be for its human being, clever
designers--but weak humans are superficial and all they see are the obvious
outward appearances of things--if even that--if they get their heads up from
their self phones to look at all. It's the TomCAT F-14 that gets the
adulation of men, while TomCRUISE the man-boy gets the attention of the
gals making TOP GUN a delicious poison that's killed naval aviation.
https://1sttac.blogspot.com/2021/12/future-warthink-039-how-top-gun-sank-us.html
Moreover, such losertards are on the wrong side of
history as mankind's aerodynamic flight powers increase daily such that
today, WE CAN MAKE ANYTHING FLY. Even a fucking large rock aka a
boulder--which frankly doesn't have to DO anything but be there ala Peter
Sellers playing Hitler in post-WW2 exile. The aerodynamic propulsion unit aka
AERO UNIT can do all the flying; the ground, air or sea vehicle detaches from
it once on the Earth's surface, and the aero unit can be let there in war
guarded/hid or guarded/locked in civilian normie peace or taken along by
towing.
LIE #2: You Can Always Fly and don't need to DRIVE--Even
in Non-Flying Weather aka TBATE: Aerodynamic Kinetic Jeopardy (AKJ)
Civilians quickly realized their air-filled rubber tired
cars/trucks CANOT go cross-country and built paved roads to pamper them and
avoid facing the weakness by creating an artificial urban reality. This costs
$$$ the wheeled French Army is not willing to pay so they retreat from Mali,
Africa defeated by TBATE--not TBAM Islamo-rebels. Such roads aka Main Supply
Routes (MSRs) would have to be picketted by troops at least within infantry
battlespace control--say 1, 000 meters or 1x topographical map grid square as
the British Army realized in the 1900 Boer war in southern Africa.
In WAR, start with tracks to out-maneuver foes THEN
seal-off the problem's borders with WALLS; then kill/capture to drain-the-swamp
of rebel malcontent bugs inside. 3D airplane leverage assists this if its
efficient with wings that fold to move on the ground (DRIVE) and can operate
without need of airbase FOBs with runways because the TRUTH that human beings
refuse to admit is AIRCRAFT CANNOT FLY IN BAD WEATHER. What is needed is weapons
systems that can FLY & DRIVE to keep moving upon the enemy. The 1st way to
do this is with MUDFIGHTERS whose wings fold so they don't bump into things
when moved on a trailer driven by trucks/tanks. Implications of aircraft that
can drive and not need pampered, obvious air bases with runways are bitterly
opposed by the arrogant aviators who would rather let 17x F-22s unable to fly
that are no longer in production get destroyed by a TBATE hurricane than fold
their wings so they can be put on a trailer and saved.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ndNAk5vvudE1/
It's like NSA 47 bastard child USAF doesn't want to fight
like it's fellow bureaucratic prostitute USMC who now want to administratively
deploy Anti-Ship Missiles (ASMs) to replay Wake island in WW2 rather than pay
for in cash/egotism proper mechanization to amphibiously assault--and not be
easily evicted.
In civilian PEACE, this refusal to respect TBATE bad
weather tragically fire-death incinerates thousands of people--even families in
crap light general aviation planes with the worst possible AKJ imbalance--too
much speed in too fragile platforms and too much volatile fuel to survive
impacts. An under 100 mph, electric, non-explosive fuel, aircraft with recovery
parachutes and air bags in a Burnelli Blended Wing Body (BWB) structure should
be able to smack into the Earth at any time and those inside not die, ever.
Crash-proof planes by deliberately staying with AKJ protective limits. AeroNASCAR
for everyone.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mD9pYp4zsCi6/
When civilians can't fly due to TBATE bad weather, they
should DRIVE in their AEROCARS just like the military should have AEROTANKS described
previously. As much as we love the TerraFugia aerocar with obvious
folded wings on the ground, it cannot be left un-attended in civilian "peacetime"
life without being stolen or envy-vandalized. TerraFugias would be great
for military/police roles where they are always manned like guarding the Trump
border wall.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/leZQ5gfLHNWC/
The aero unit detaching and becoming a trailer is the
best answer for both civilian life where its an anti-kriminal necessity and
military life to keep it from being damaged when the aerotank fights on the
ground.
LIE #3: BAD VTOL from Overly-Complex, TBATE Unsafe
Rotary-Winged, Helicopters are somehow AOK when GOOD VTOL by Wings that Jump Fly
are needed
No one on Earth is more idiotic and wasteful than the
USMIL that owns, operates, crash-dies and is bankrupted by more overly-complex,
TBATE unsafe helicopters than anyone else in the world.
At the same time demanding obvious, pampered air bases
with runways for fixed-wing aircraft that need lift to accumulate before
taking-off, damning the USAF, Army and Mc to being D.O.T.G., thousands of
fuel-hoggy, maintenance pampered helicopters are operated without their VTOL
attaining significant war CONOPS effects of being dispersed, camouflaged,
hardened from enemy detection/destruction. They can hover air assault and get
creamed by enemy anti-aircraft fires:
www.combatreform.org/fries.htm
The helicopter lie-excuse for their racketeering
existence is that VTOL fixed wing is too hard to do when ducted fans are the
rage of fake flying car designers--ANYTHING CAN BE MADE TO FLY--even rock
humans with no brains by computers. The tilt-wing and ducted fans/engines can
be easily applied ending the need for runways and their defeat-inviting bases
and even wheel traces on the ground to enemy air/space observation.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BhJoG6MqMVya/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7dNPOdsDk8
The Luddite helicopter fanboys don't think they
personally can pull Gs in high performance fixed-wing flight necessary to avoid
being shot-down by SAMs so they'd rather more easily crash & burn from
every kind of small arms fire like AK47s (AKMs) and RPGs in their rotary-wing,
pussy wagons. They don't even want to fly in light tanks more valiant infantry
need claiming they'll crash if one engine conks out--THEN ADD A 3rd ENGINE LIKE
THE CH-53E/K does and STFU, cowards.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/foErJHZDh24B/
Our tank-less heroes are getting slaughtered just like in
Beirut and Blackhawk Down! 14-hour firefights because rotorheads don't
want to fly light tanks to give them COMBAT OVERMATCH. The LINNIES are causing
their own martyrdom by refusing to buy Weasel 2 light tanks that fit
into and RO-RO from as-is CH-47F Chinooks--LIE #1 wheels can do only
what tracks can do strikes again as they are too top-heavy to fit inside.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vHeqmljNIp8g/
The TBAM problem of universal air/space
observation/attack by PDMs and TFS demands FOB-LESS WARFARE; long-ranging,
large space/weight inefficient, break-bulk transport aircraft like C-17s,
C-130s, CH-47s, CH-53E/Ks cannot be easily hidden and driven like smaller
MUDFIGHTERS even if their wings fold. If they were KIWI POD based, they could
pick-up and drop off BATTLEBOX containers fast like our world that lives by
container ships does.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/N2hlcUjCDylf/
When not flying, large transports must not be easily
targeted from air/space on paved, urbanized FOBs/air bases by Air Cushion
Landing Systems (ACLSes) leaving no running TO/L trace and are hidden by
multi-spectral camouflage neeting.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KhpxnyJXUQ8L/
Within the 100 mile radius, TACTICAL battlespace, ground
vehicle tracked tanks, MUDFIGHTERS and SFBs would fly by Aero Units like our
proposed FVVLP ("FLYveeps") to evade pervasive enemy C4ISR. As
much as possible, long-range ACLS transports must stay out of the tactical
battlespace any longer than to drop or airland its cargoes including paratroops
and paratanks. ACLS LRTAs are in fact, Long-Range Amphibious Seaplanes (LRAs)
that on the water leave no obvious trace to air/space enemy spying and could be
covertly loaded/refueled/armed by fast armored surface ships and transport
submarines.
Lie #4 Live within CONstant Land Runway Dependent
Jeopardy
A retired U.S. ARMY LTC aviator once told me when flying
STOL grasshoppers which can easily TO/L from 300 foot football fields visible
from 1, 000 feet AGL, he constantly notionally spotted potential emergency
put-down points. Had he had a RP or VTOL means this neurotic but TBATE humble
practice could be averted.
CONstant Runway Dependent Jeopardy (CONRDJ) is magnified
when flying over oceans as visibly demonstrated with Amelia Earheart's loss in
1937. Had she been in a plane with a boat hull aka SEAPLANE taken some
aerodynamic drag flight performance lumps, when she and her navigator FUCKED-UP
(vulgarity necessary here), NO PROBLEMO. Set down in the water before running
completely out of fuel to MOTOR to shore after getting directions on the radio
and/or being rescued with her Japanese base spy over-flight film intact.
https://jamesbondisreal.blogspot.com/2020/06/spythink-019-amelia-earharts-fatal.html
Even though clever design can make jet flying boat
seaplanes and retracting skis just as streamlined as land planes making this
moot point:
www.combatreform.org/p6mseamaster.htm
www.combatreform.org/seaplanefighters.htm
www.combatreform.org/seaplanetransports.htm
There is another minimalist option: enable land planes to
land 1x time and float in TBATE weather/PEA and TBAM warfighting emergencies by
bottom airframe shaping and water-proofing. Large delta-wings like the fabulous
Vulcan bomber just need water-proofing to safely water-land as James
Bond EON movie-makers demonstrated in 1965 "Thunderball".
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mgvgTDwhmzvr/
A minimalist seaplane capability (MINSC) could be also
attained by clever fuel tank floats as proposed for the P-38 in WW2 to
self-cross oceans eliminating ship transporting and is easily doable with the
A-4's SOP 2x fuel tanks made into floats making them "HydroHawks".
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TUQrmbbvw5nu/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/rtFUA6kJ8QC5/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/29lNleARG5pd/
AKJ and CONRDJ are eliminated by folding wing, Fly/Drive
(FWFD), BWB, RPs, VTOL, ACLS and MINSC.
The whole aircraft carrier flat top poorly executed by
having a superstructure island preventing large right wings (pun hahaha) from
landing is a naval form of CONRDJ.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E6D8RWwNNf7o/
The Midway Myth mania has damned the USN as a
whole into a fatal seaplane-less, vulnerable TIN can VPFX existence that will
explode one day into the USS Indianapolis fiasco on steroids.
www.combatreform.org/midwaymyth.htm
Thousands of MILSHEEPLE will die from TBATE salt water
and weather exposure and sharks eating them.
www.combatreform.org/abandonshiphopetodie.htm
Again, civilian nihilist normies having no skin in
national defense have left naval warfare to TOP GUN racketeers which could cost
us our super power status and our very existence. So much for 2x oceans
protecting us!
Desperation solutions are to conduct flight tests to
ascertain a F-35B VTOL capability on the fan decks of all our TIN CAN surface
ship destroyers, frigates and cruisers ASAP since the handful of stupid
carriers will be kept out of enemy ballistic ASM range lest quickly destroyed with
decks awash in fuel, bomb-laden aircraft aka USS Forrestal fire in 1967.
www.combatreform.org/seaplanefighters.htm
The perfect answer of unmanned/manned ski and/or VTOL
seaplane fighters will take $1B and 10x years we don't have--but we should
start work on it.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2MpArjDGAE58/
LIE #6: It's AOK to administratively deploy marines with
ASMs to snipe at enemy ships that can't combined-arms warfight to prevent
eviction with no escape to Japan or Australia?
NSA 47 bastard child HQMC (USMC) has given up on
amphibious warfare requiring humble adults that can maintain/operate combined
arms weaponry and engineering tools for administratively deploying these
teenagers with ASMs to islands the Japanese have agreed to give us in event of
CHICOM threatening democratic Taiwan.
The Taiwanese have successfully held off CHICOM eviction
of hugely important nearby islands by the COMBAT OVERMATCH of light tanks. A
smart USMC would obtain as many M113A4 Super Gavins with 30mm
autocannon/ATGM retracting weapons stations that RO-RO from their CH-53K King
Stallions.
Human decency and common sense (I know nihilist Amerika
lack these) demands there be a PLAN B to escape to Japan or even Australia
where buxom babes await as long as you show you've taken the deathjab so your
remaining 3x to 5x years can at least be sexhappy as per the 1958 movie, "On
the Beach". HQMC should secretly buy a squadron of 12x Japanese Shin
Meiwa US-2 LRAs and develop an inflatoplane WIG craft that transports a pair of
enlisted gyrenes to a nearby Allied Nation Operating Base (ANOB).
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WsxVn7d658lg/
Make the inflato-WIG computer flown if enlisted pilot
egotism that might with a flight suit get them laid with Meg Ryans is sooo damn
intolerable. No wings = no sex. Paramarines that can parachute drop into ASM
blocking positions would solve forced abstinence as well as eliminating need
for 3, 000 foot Assault Landings Zones (ALZs) for C-130s to airland. Such
obvious ASM blocking points will invite TFS so mechanical burrowing and
multi-spectral camouflage is needed to be detailed in PART 2.
LIE #5: Large Fighter-Bombers-for-Everything, the USAF
Delusion Feeding Everything they Do
In WW2, the Nazi German Luftwaffe was cursed by
the failure of their large, long-range, twin-engined Me110s unable to prevail
in Air Combat Maneuvering (ACM) aka dogfighting against more nimble
single-engined RAF Hurricanes and Spitfires in the 1940 Battle of
Britain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_110
The Messerschmitt Bf 110, often known unofficially as the
Me 110,[2] is a twin-engine Zerstörer (Destroyer, heavy fighter),
fighter-bomber (Jagdbomber or Jabo), and night fighter (Nachtjäger)
developed in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and used by the Luftwaffe during
World War II. Hermann Göring was a proponent of the Bf 110, believing its heavy
armament, speed, and range would make the Bf 110 the Luftwaffe’s premier
offensive fighter. Early variants were armed with two MG FF 20 mm cannon, four
7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 17 machine guns, and one 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 15 machine
gun for defence (later variants would replace the MG FFs with MG 151s and the
rear gunner station would be armed with the twin-barreled MG 81Z). Development
work on an improved type to replace the Bf 110 - the Messerschmitt Me 210 -
began before the war started, but its teething troubles resulted in the Bf 110
soldiering on until the end of the war in various roles. Its intended
replacements, the aforementioned Me 210 and the significantly improved Me 410 Hornisse
never fully replaced the Bf 110.
The Bf 110 served with considerable success in the early
campaigns in Poland, Norway and France. The primary weakness of the Bf 110 was
its lack of maneuverability, although this could be mitigated with
better tactics. This weakness was exploited by the RAF when Bf 110s were flown
as close escort to German bombers during the Battle of Britain. When British
bombers began targeting German territory with nightly raids, some Bf
110-equipped units were converted to night fighters, a role to which the
aircraft was well suited. After the Battle of Britain the Bf 110 enjoyed a
successful period as an air superiority fighter and strike aircraft in other
theatres and defended Germany from strategic air attack by day against the
USAAF's 8th Air Force, until an American change in fighter tactics rendered
them increasingly vulnerable to developing American air supremacy over the
Reich as 1944 began.
During the Balkans and North African campaigns and on the
Eastern Front, it rendered valuable ground support to the German Army as
a potent fighter-bomber. Later in the war, it was developed into a formidable
radar-equipped night fighter, becoming the main night-fighting aircraft of the Luftwaffe.
Most of the German night fighter aces flew the Bf 110 at some point during
their combat careers and the top night fighter ace, Major Heinz-Wolfgang
Schnaufer, flew it exclusively and claimed 121 victories in 164
sorties.[3]
****
The Me110's long range was impressively demonstrated by
Nazi 2IC Rudolph Hess duped by Commander Ian Fleming's naval intelligence
tricks into flying one to Scotland with a peace overture resulting his life
imprisonment into the 1980s to guarantee his silence over WW2's real Illuminati
instigations. Martin Bormann replaced him as Nazi 2IC holding all their stolen
loot in Swiss banks resulting in Commander Fleming leading commandos to rescue
him from Berlin in 1945 to get $1B that later funded the British atomic bomb.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jHwnQ76xxh4P/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/yWlveSIJEbJv/
The question is why was the 2x-engined, 2x 1, 000 hp Me110 WITHOUT COUNTER-ROTATING PROPS a failure in ACM against single-engine fighters when the twin-engined, 2x 1, 400 hp P-38 WITH COUNTER-ROTATING PROPS could shoot-down Zeros more maneuverable than Spifires?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning
The Lockheed P-38 Lightning is an American
single-seated, twin piston-engined fighter aircraft that was used during World
War II. Developed for the United States Army Air Corps by the Lockheed
Corporation, the P-38 incorporated a distinctive twin boom design with a
central nacelle containing the cockpit and armament. Allied propaganda claimed
it had been nicknamed the fork-tailed devil (German: der Gabelschwanz-Teufel)
by the Luftwaffe and "two planes, one pilot" by the
Japanese.[4] Along with its use as a general fighter, the P-38 was used in
various aerial combat roles, including as a highly effective fighter-bomber, a
night fighter, and as a long-range escort fighter when equipped with drop
tanks.[5] The P-38 was also used as a bomber-pathfinder, guiding streams of
medium and heavy bombers; or even other P-38s, equipped with bombs, to their
targets.[6] Used in the aerial reconnaissance role, the P-38 accounted for 90%
of the aerial film captured over Europe.[7]
The P-38 was used most successfully in the Pacific
Theater of Operations and the China-Burma-India Theater of Operations as the
aircraft of America's top aces, Richard Bong (40 victories), Thomas McGuire
(38 victories), and Charles H. MacDonald (27 victories). In the South West
Pacific Theater, the P-38 was the primary long-range fighter of United States
Army Air Forces until the introduction of large numbers of P-51D Mustangs
toward the end of the war.[8][page needed] Unusual for a fighter engine power
was boosted by turbosuperchargers giving the P-38 good high-altitude
performance, making it one of the earliest Allied fighters capable of
performing well at high altitudes. The exhaust was muffled by the
turbosuperchargers, making the P-38's operation relatively quiet. [9] It was
extremely forgiving and could be mishandled in many ways, but the rate of
roll in the early versions was too low for it to excel as a dogfighter.[10]
The P-38 was the only American fighter aircraft in large-scale production
throughout American involvement in the war, from the Attack on Pearl Harbor to
Victory over Japan Day.[11]
Many of the British order of 524 Lightning IIs
were fitted with stronger F-10 Allison engines as they became available, and
all were given wing pylons for fuel tanks or bombs. The upgraded aircraft were
deployed to the Pacific as USAAC F-5A reconnaissance or P-38G fighter models,
the latter used with great effect to shoot down Admiral Yamamoto in April 1943.
Robert Petit's G model named "Miss Virginia" was on that
mission, borrowed by Rex Barber, who was later credited with the kill. Petit
had already used "Miss Virginia" to defeat two Nakajima A6M2-N
"Rufe" floatplanes in February and to heavily damage a
Japanese submarine chaser in March, which he mistakenly claimed as a destroyer
sunk. Murray "Jim" Shubin used a less powerful F model he
named "Oriole" to down five confirmed and possibly six Zeros
over Guadalcanal in June 1943 to become ace in a day.[60]
The P-38 was credited with destroying more Japanese
aircraft than any other USAAF fighter.[3] While the P-38 could not
out-turn the A6M Zero and most other Japanese fighters when flying
below 200 mph (320 km/h), its superior speed coupled with a good rate of
climb meant that it could use energy tactics, making multiple high-speed passes
at its target. In addition, its tightly grouped guns were even more deadly
to lightly armored Japanese warplanes than to German aircraft. The
concentrated, parallel stream of bullets allowed aerial victory at much
longer distances than fighters carrying wing guns. Dick Bong, the United
States' highest-scoring World War II air ace (40 victories in P-38s), flew
directly at his targets to ensure he hit them, in some cases flying through the
debris of his target (and on one occasion colliding with an enemy aircraft
which was claimed as a "probable" victory). The twin Allison
engines performed admirably in the Pacific.
In the Pacific theater, the P-38 downed over 1,800
Japanese aircraft, with more than 100 pilots becoming aces by
downing five or more enemy aircraft.[104] American fuel supplies contributed to
a better engine performance and maintenance record, and range was increased
with leaner mixtures. In the second half of 1944, the P-38L pilots out of Dutch
New Guinea were flying 950 mi (1,530 km), fighting for 15 minutes and
returning to base.[108] Such long legs were invaluable until the P-47N and
P-51D entered service.
The strategic bombing proponents within the USAAF, called
the Bomber Mafia by their
ideological opponents, had established in the early 1930s a policy against
research to create long-range fighters, which they thought would not be
practical; this kind of research was not to compete for bomber resources.
Aircraft manufacturers understood that they would not be rewarded if they
installed subsystems on their fighters to enable them to carry drop tanks to
provide more fuel for extended range. Lieutenant Kelsey, acting against this
policy, risked his career in late 1941 when he convinced Lockheed to
incorporate such subsystems in the P-38E model, without putting his request in
writing. Kelsey possibly was responding to Colonel George William Goddard's
observation that the U.S. sorely needed a high-speed, long-range photo
reconnaissance plane. Along with a change order specifying some P-38Es be
produced without guns, but with photo reconnaissance cameras, to be designated
the F-4-1-LO, Lockheed began working out the problems of drop-tank design and
incorporation. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, eventually about 100 P-38Es
were sent to a modification center near Dallas, Texas, or to the new Lockheed
assembly plant B-6 (today the Burbank Airport), to be fitted with four K-17
aerial photography cameras. All of these aircraft were also modified to be able
to carry drop tanks. P-38Fs were modified, as well. Every Lightning from
the P-38G onward was capable of being fitted with drop tanks straight off the
assembly line.[62]
In March 1942, General Arnold made an off-hand comment
that the U.S. could avoid the German U-boat menace by flying fighters to
the U.K. (rather than packing them onto ships). President Roosevelt
pressed the point, emphasizing his interest in the solution. Arnold was likely
aware of the flying radius extension work being done on the P-38, which by this
time had seen success with small drop tanks in the range of 150 to 165 U.S. gal
(570 to 620 L), the difference in capacity being the result of subcontractor
production variation. Arnold ordered further tests with larger drop tanks in
the range of 300 to 310 U.S. gal (1,100 to 1,200 L); the results were reported
by Kelsey as providing the P-38 with a 2,500-mile (4,000 km) ferrying
range.[62] Because of available supply, the smaller drop tanks were used to fly
Lightnings to the U.K., the plan called Operation BOLERO.
Led by two Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses, the
first seven P-38s, each carrying two small drop tanks, left Presque Isle Army
Air Field on 23 June 1942 for RAF Heathfield in Scotland. Their first refueling
stop was made in far northeast Canada at Goose Bay. The second stop was a rough
airstrip in Greenland called Bluie West One, and the third refueling stop was
in Iceland at Keflavik. Other P-38s followed this route with some lost in
mishaps, usually due to poor weather, low visibility, radio difficulties, and
navigational errors. Nearly 200 of the P-38Fs (and a few modified Es) were
successfully flown across the Atlantic in July–August 1942, making the P-38 the
first USAAF fighter to reach Britain and the first fighter ever to be delivered
across the Atlantic under its own power.[63] Kelsey himself piloted one of the Lightnings,
landing in Scotland on 25 July.[64]
****
IMHO, the P-38's handed engine problem could have been solved and greater
flight performance attained by pusher-pull configuration as proposed in our
P-38X:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QBM8-P0Mjg
Moreover, powerful 2x cannon armament in front of the twin booms set to converge would have compensated for losing the nose armament concentration with the benefits of no 1x engine-out asymmetric thrust and handed engines complications. An ejection seat was needed in the twin-tail P-38 regardless out its engine configuration.
Having 2x jet engines close together seemed to have
deluded the USAF with its 1943 North Africa FBFE mentality that a long-range
heavy fighter with lots of fuel could ACM dogfight beat smaller, lighter
single-seat fighters with home field advantage of already being there; the F-4
losses against MIG-17s and 21s over North Vietnam contradict this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elkCBFE4u1M
The drop tank and in-flight refuel tankers to keep
tactical fighter-bomber "lawn darts" in the air failed to
geostrategically bomb North Vietnam into submission with 10, 000 bomb loads so
B-52 heavy bombers with 80, 000 pound bomb loads finally got the enemy to quit.
Is the 2x engined F-15 the new P-38?
The perfect F-15 Eagle 100 to none loss rate
combat record demands an explanation as to whether it can out-ACM dogfight
single-engined fighters or not? The F-14 could not despite all the TOP GUN
DISinfo. 1st, the F-15 flies HIGHER and FASTER than others so it swats down
MIGs with long-range, radar guided AAMs that finally worked with AIM-120
AMRAAMs. Next, it has high energy maneuver advantage diving down on MIGs like
the P-38s did. What does RED FLAG show about F-15 versus say F-5s in turning
dogfights? Can it do the Cobra maneuver?
From a common sense perspective, something bigger and
larger is going to be less maneuverable than something smaller and lighter, all
other factors equal.
It also seems common sense that the still-in-production,
F-15 should be upgraded with folding wings, Vectored Thrust Canards (VTCs) and
prudent stealth shaping/coverings to maximize its ACM and enable STOL
operations form covert land bases and have over 1, 000 mile combat radiuses so
USN stupid carriers can contribute to battles and not hide like the German surface
fleet did in WW1/WW2. Lift fans/jets to make Sea Eagles VTOL are another
possibility.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kQui9E8tYSrq/
Such F-15NXwhatever Sea Eagles should have a rear
seater, enlisted back-up pilot/observer who can guard against enemy MIG attacks
by rearward firing AAMs and/or lasers if the later can work. R2D2 from "Star
Wars", normies.
Another country in dire CHICOM straits (pun intended) is
Australia which has bought absurd, short-range, single-engined F-35As and no
VSTOL Bs for its 2x carriers which have skil jumps for them. I'm not convinced
the single engined, F-35 smallness equates to it being ACM dogfight superior in
flight performance to a Chinese J15 with canards if the latter can get to Oz by
ski jump carrier, air refueling etc.
For the sake of argument, let's ASS U ME the F-35 has the
defensive advantage like a Spitfire/Hurricane to do to the CHICOMs like
the Germans got in the 1940 Battle of Britain.
HOW do we get F-35As to defensive battlespaces far away
from Oz?
Parasite them. I know a derogatory word. Platform them
there on Airborne Aircraft Carriers (AACs).
www.combatreform.org/airborneaircraftcarriers.htm
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lATs7wo03SsD/
The Boeing 747 is available and with a flat top "deck" and twin tails like the aerospace plane Shuttle shuttler had could launch/recover 2x F-35As aka a leader & wingman. The mother AAC carries the dangerous & non-sexy fuel for the long ranges needed over the Indo-Pacific.
The problem with the 747 needs 6, 000 foot runways and is
itself difficult to hide from air/space surveillance.
Therefore, we propose a twin-tail, Shin Meiwa LRASes be
obtained to each launch & possibly air-recover a F-35A to create a 24/7/365
continuous outer air defensive barrier PATROL guarding Oz that when in
"REST" mode lands on the water leaving no telltale trace for enemy
air/space surveillance.
YES, it's fucking something new.
A NEW idea.
Imagine that! This generation actually doing something
never done before taking on DEATH risks.
Summary/Conclusion
TNW = Tracks Not Wheels
FWFD = Folding Wings; Fly & Drive
ACLS = Air Cushion Landing Systems land anywhere land/sea
BWB = Blended Wing Body, crash-resistant planes
VTOL = Vertical Take-Off & Landing by Fixed Wing
aircraft with Ducted and/or jet fans--NOT HELICOPTERS!
MINSC = Minimal Seaplane Capabilities by all if can't do
ACLS or skis
VTC = Vectored Thrust Canards for SM & STOL
AAC = Airborne Aircraft Carriers
NOTES
Aleksey Naumenko, works at Irkut Corporation
Updated Jun 1, 2020 ·
Upvoted by Adrian Kruger, Qualified pilot with a PPL,
student of all things Aviation.
How is it done in Russia ...Foreplane (canard surfaces)
increases the instability of the aircraft, which allows for large overloads
without increasing the strength of the wing and tail unit, and reduce balancing
losses during maneuvering. At large angles of attack, the foreplane improves
the stability and controllability characteristics in the roll and pitch control
channels, which expands the maneuvering zone permissible at angles of attack.
In addition, the well-chosen scheme of the mutual arrangement of the foreplane
and the bearing body, due to favorable interference, gives a much larger
increase in maximum lifting force than the addition of lifting force from the
foreplane itself ...Fig. Su-27Initially, the Su-27 did not have a foreplane
...Nevertheless, the use of foreplane on the Su-27 is
logical, because the classic controlled stabilizer of the aircraft does not
create a negative pitching moment, but a positive pitching moment — due to
static instability — therefore, the stall of the flow on the stabilizer begins
earlier — the stabilizer cannot create a moment. Foreplane, on the contrary,
creates a negative pitching moment, therefore it is efficient in all ranges of
angles of attack ...In the mid-80s, it was decided to begin the modernization
of the Su-27 in the Su-27M, in order to increase the combat capabilities of the
aircraft when working on ground targets. The main object of modernization was
the radar. To install a new phased-array radar on the Su-27 had to increase the
size of the aircraft. For this, the nose of the aircraft was extended to
accommodate an antenna of a larger diameter. The nose of the aircraft, in the
end, turned out to be heavier than that of the Su-27, the balance changed, etc.
...Foreplane was installed on the Su-27M, which is not typical for aircraft
built according to the classical aerodynamic scheme ...Foreplane installation
allowed to improve the alignment of the aircraft, increase the lifting force of
the wing, improve takeoff and landing characteristics and maneuverability. At
the same time, two additional suspension points appeared, the nose landing gear
was strengthened and the height of the fins was increased. The airspeed tube
has “disappeared”
...Fig. Su-30SM (evolutionary development of the Su-30MKI
export family)In the mid-90s, contracts for airplanes appeared ... Since a
two-seat aircraft lost in a maneuver to a single-seat aircraft (due to the
heavy nose part), when creating an export Su-30 with foreplane, the experience
of foreplane with Su-27M was used ...Fig. Su-33On the naval Su-33, the
foreplane primarily improves performance at high angles of attack and low speed
(when starting from a “springboard”), and on the Su-30, in addition, it
shifts the aerodynamic center forward, which is necessary to maintain pitching
instability (due to the new radar) ...Fig. Su-34In addition, on the Su-34
foreplane performs the function of a damper when flying at a very low altitude
in a disturbed surface atmosphere ...
Fig. Su-35SThe current Su-35 is a single-seat “Su-27”,
with a modernized airframe and control system built on new materials,
components and technologies. For the first time in Russia, composites and other
modern structural materials were widely used in aircraft construction, which
made it possible to do without foreplane, the drag (aerodynamic) flap was
removed, and “trimmed” keels appeared ...Su-35 is easier than Su-27. In
short, we returned to the original Su-27 aerodynamic design ...How to do it
abroad ...When choosing one of the three aerodynamic balancing schemes, it
should be borne in mind that due to the difficulty in obtaining large values of
the increment of lift due to the use of wing mechanization (especially for the
tailless scheme), the tailless scheme and the canard scheme for takeoff and
landing are forced to go to large angles of attack. Structurally, this makes it
impossible (or difficult) to use large and medium wing aspect ratio swept wings
on such aircraft, since the use of such wings and large angles of attack is
associated with a very high height of the nose landing gear ...As a result, for
high-speed planes in the canard and tailless schemes, only small wing aspect
ratio wings of a delta, gothic, ogival delta or crescent shape in plan can be
used. Due to the small wing aspect ratio, such wings have low lift-to-drag
ratio at subsonic flight modes ...Thus, the use of the canard and tailless
schemes is advisable for aircraft in which the main flight mode is flying at
supersonic speed. The usual, “classic/ normal” scheme is most
appropriate for subsonic aircraft or aircraft in which the flight mode at
subsonic speed prevails over supersonic flight modes ...
The Future Battlefield and Civilian Life Demands Lies Be
Discarded and Truths Acted On, PART 2: Sink the Army & Air Force under
Ground
Concealment Not Being Done and Not Multi-Spectral
Camouflage Enough by USMIL
Comments
Post a Comment